The only reason that they have been able to do this is lack of support; they keep trying to revictimise me. The more peeps who see the evidence the better

It appears that I was correctly identified as an early onset or “primary transsexual” by Keith Hawton, now Professor of Adolescent Suicide Research at Oxford some time after 18/11/82 as Dr K wrote to him saying he had “no personal experience”.

The school where I was resident at the time had an expectation of “expert counselling” and as they were in loco parentis Dr K needed their permission before fondling my genitals for whatever reason

The GMC have blatantly discriminated against me as Paul Rowe was used as a witness against Russell Reid for offences going back to 1988. The GMC have got their own rules wrong and not answered my complaints about fraud and dishonesty.

Dr K was telling three different stories throughout the time he was seeing me and the lies that he told my housemaster after I had attempted suicide on 6/11/82 about me being obviously V disturbed and needing “psychiatric therapy” were used to inform my future medical treatment. He was also claiming to be a “specialist” who was “genuinely very concerned about me”. (8/11/82)

Now the abuse is coming into the open , the GMC can hardly claim that it is not in the public interest to have a hearing because said Dr has a reputation and my MP says he sounds like Harold Shipman.

However, i mean what i say here…and i think i even surprised myself. In general terms, in most social interactions,it is not for the toucher to tell the touchee what is acceptable or what they should or should not find intimidating.

i’ve been on the receiving end of a twitter mob and even that…verbal abuse alone…is pretty awful.

i’ve been in situation now where i am pretty sure no harm was intended by another party, but…i felt seriously intimidated and where, if they were repeated, i would say as much.

Suzanne Moore tonight was tweeting to the effect that she found the tweeting intimidating. i get that. It may be, logically, that you can make a case for why it isn’t.

But if she feels intimidated and/or says she does, we must listen. Because if we don’t listen, we are on very dangerous ground indeed.

jane xx

For her to suggest that people who disagree with her turning up at a PUBLIC DEBATE is some sort of intimidation or threat is similarly ridiculous.

This constant spreading of lies about how the trans community has attacked and threatened her is wearing thin. She keeps going on about being labelled an “EDL supporter” following a completely bizarre tweet from this guy: https://twitter.com/SCOUSEYNWA/status/289499269856100352

Too many people are feeding this idea of a baying mob going after her. I think someone else summed it up pretty solidly elsewhere, what’s happened is the result of having a big platform, a format that allows everyone pretty equal access to speak their mind, and her having the ability to offend a few thousand people at once. I’d add to that the lack of awareness or willingness to recognise that everyone else’s free speech can be uncomfortable if you’re going to be loudly obnoxious.

Meanwhile she’s free to stamp heavily all over us, defame the trans community at large, be really rude and misrepresentative about our issues, stereotype us and play the victim when we complain about it. Stuff that. Poor her having to hear from and live in a world with people who don’t like what she has to say.

jane xx

But I suppose the real danger of twitter is its immediacy with no army of editors and sub-editors to challenge… But wait that’s what the Observer is supposed to have…

Now that is called irony.

That’s the difficulty with twitter…no verbal colour.

jane xx

“Read this piece of shit and Pink News will hear from my lawyers in the morning”

I’m trying hard to reread this as an example of laughing and dancing and playing with words, and coming up empty. Had the phrase “this shit” been absent I can see that she might – just might – have passed it off as an ironic comment on the modern tendency of some people (not trans people, they can’t afford it) to litigate at the drop of a hat. But “this shit” is not lighthearted.